AI visibility report · sample
Synect GEO
www.synectgeo.io (opens in a new tab)- 6 September 2026, 17:57 Irish time
- Run 7 of 7 · compared with 6 September 2026
- 30 prompts · 120 answers
- Markets: United States, Ireland, United Kingdom
AI-generated report. Built from answers by ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude, and classified by Claude Sonnet 4.6. Review before acting on it.
Not a like-for-like comparison with 6 September 2026. Between the two runs:
- Claude no longer searches the web, which changes which answers can earn a citation at all.
- ChatGPT can now write a longer answer (600 → 1000 tokens); Perplexity can now write a longer answer (600 → 1000 tokens). Longer or fuller answers name more brands, so mentions can move for reasons that have nothing to do with your brand.
Every change marked indicative below is affected, so treat it as indicative rather than like-for-like.
Headline figures
AI visibility score
10 out of 100,Low band
up 4 points since the previous run from 6 on 6 September 2026 indicative
Weighted 70% web-search citations and 30% mentions. The vertical line marks the previous run.
Mention rate
9%
11 of 120 answers named you
up 2 percentage points since the previous run from 7% indicative
Web-search citation rate
10%
6 of 60 web-search answers cited a source alongside you
up 4 percentage points since the previous run from 6% indicative
Share of voice
2%
Ranked 10th of 47: you, plus the 46 other vendors named in more than one answer
no change since the previous run from 2% indicative
Average position when named 1.0 (1 = named first) · over 11 answers · no change since the previous run indicative
Tone when named: 6 positive, 5 neutral, 0 negative
Summary
Written by SynectGEO from this run's figures, not AI output.
Synect GEO was named in 9% of AI answers (11 of 120), ranking 10th of 47: itself, plus the 46 other vendors named in more than one answer. When it was named, its average position was 1, where 1 means named first. A source was cited alongside it in 10% of web-search answers (6 of 60). No engine named it on 27 of 30 prompts.
By engine
Only engines that search the web can cite a source. Gemini and Claude answered from what they already know, so their citations are not measured. That is not the same as zero.
| Engine | How it answered | Answers | Mention rate | Web-search citation rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPTGPT-5.4 | Searched the web | 30 | 10% | 10% |
| GeminiGemini 2.5 Flash | Model knowledge | 30 | 7% | Not measured |
| PerplexitySonar | Searched the web | 30 | 10% | 10% |
| ClaudeClaude Sonnet 4.6 | Model knowledge | 30 | 10% | Not measured |
By market
Each market had 40 answers.
| Market | Answers | Named you | Mention rate | Web-search answers | Web-search citation rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 4 | 10% | 20 | 10% |
| Ireland | 40 | 4 | 10% | 20 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 40 | 3 | 8% | 20 | 10% |
By topic
Mention rate is the share of a topic's answers that named you. Web-search citation rate is the share of its web-search answers that cited a source alongside you. Topics differ in how many answers they had, so compare the rates, not the counts.
| Topic | Prompts | Answers | Mention rate | Web-search citation rate | Tone when named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial and transactional prompts | 19 | 76 | 9% | 11% | 4 positive · 3 neutral · 0 negative |
| Informational prompts | 7 | 28 | 0% | 0% | No answers named you |
| Feature checklist | 4 | 16 | 25% | 25% | 2 positive · 2 neutral · 0 negative |
Since the last run
17:24 to 17:57, on one 0–100 scale. Comparing the last two of 7 runs. This comparison is not like-for-like, so every change here is indicative.
Score
up 4 points since the previous run indicative
Run Score 17:24 6 17:57 10 Mention rate
up 2 percentage points since the previous run indicative
Run Mention rate 17:24 7% 17:57 9% Web-search citation rate
up 4 percentage points since the previous run indicative
Run Web-search citation rate 17:24 6% 17:57 10% Share of voice
no change since the previous run indicative
Run Share of voice 17:24 2% 17:57 2%
| Count | 17:24 | 17:57 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Answers that named you | 8 | 11 | up 3 since the previous run indicative |
| Web-search answers that cited a source alongside you | 5 | 6 | up 1 since the previous run indicative |
| Distinct source pages in those answers | 44 | 46 | up 2 since the previous run indicative |
Source pages move with how many links a model tends to give, and can include your own site, so fewer is not necessarily worse.
Every answer
What each engine said for each prompt.
Showing 30 of 30 prompts
Filters change this table only. The figures at the top are always for the whole run.
- Cited: named, with a source
- Named
- Not named
A word under a cell, such as positive, is the tone of an answer that named you.
Google AI Overview: Cited means the overview linked to your site; Named means it named you without linking. Checked on 30 of 30 prompts, and not part of the score.
| Prompt | ChatGPTWeb search | GeminiModel knowledge | PerplexityWeb search | ClaudeModel knowledge | Google AI OverviewNot in the score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial and transactional prompts | |||||
| How do I compare AI visibility platforms before buying one for my team when I need to measure commercial intent and transactional intent in AI answers?United States · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| Is there a free or low-cost way to audit how my brand appears in answer engines for commercial and transactional question sets?United States · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| What should I look for in a platform that scores mentions, citations, sentiment, and commercial intent and transactional intent?United States · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| Can a platform generate commercial and transactional question sets and recommendations to improve how often answer engines reference my site?United States · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| How do I choose a tool that can handle commercial and transactional question sets, show competitor share, sentiment, and exportable reports?United States · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | No overview |
| What is the best AI visibility tracking software for a team that wants to see mentions and citations across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity?Ireland · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| Which platform gives the most useful AI visibility score and audit reports for a brand that needs to improve how it shows up in answer engines?Ireland · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| How do I compare AI assistant visibility tools that include competitor analysis, sentiment tracking, and exportable reporting before I buy?Ireland · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| Which software is best for tracking how often my company is cited by answer engines and for showing where competitors are being mentioned instead?Ireland · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| Are there any answer-engine monitoring tools with pricing that makes sense for a growing business and includes prompt generation for ongoing audits?Ireland · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| What are the strongest alternatives to manual mention checks for a business seeking a repeatable audit workflow?Ireland · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| How does Synect GEO compare on AI visibility scoring, prompt creation, and exportable reports for a marketing team?Ireland · Commercial and transactional prompts | Citedpositive | Namedneutral | Citedpositive | Namedneutral | Named |
| What is the best software for tracking how our brand is mentioned and cited in AI assistant answers worldwide?United Kingdom · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| How much should a business expect to pay for AI visibility tracking software with reporting and exports?United Kingdom · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| What are the strongest alternatives to manual visibility audits for a marketing team?United Kingdom · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| How do I compare different tools for monitoring brand mentions across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity?United Kingdom · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| Can Synect GEO help us measure citations, generate audit prompts, and export reports for stakeholders?United Kingdom · Commercial and transactional prompts | Citedpositive | Not named | Citedpositive | Namedneutral | Named |
| Which platform is best for spotting where assistant answers mention competitors instead of us?United Kingdom · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| Which AI visibility product is best for a marketing team that needs a repeatable audit workflow worldwide?United Kingdom · Commercial and transactional prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| Informational prompts | |||||
| What is the best software to track how AI assistants mention and cite my brand in informational prompts?United States · Informational prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| Which AI visibility platform is best for a B2B company that wants more citations in assistant answers from informational prompts?United States · Informational prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| What are the best options for measuring brand mentions across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity in informational prompts?United States · Informational prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| How much does AI visibility tracking software usually cost for a mid-sized business that focuses on informational prompts worldwide?United States · Informational prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| Which visibility tool gives a clear score, competitor comparison, and sentiment breakdown for our brand in informational prompts?United Kingdom · Informational prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| What should I look for in a tool for informational prompts that recommends content changes to improve mentions?United Kingdom · Informational prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| Is there a tool for informational prompts that can identify gaps in our off-site presence affecting assistant answers?United Kingdom · Informational prompts | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| Feature checklist | |||||
| How well does Synect GEO measure brand visibility in AI assistants compared with other options?United States · Feature checklist | Citedneutral | Namedpositive | Citedpositive | Namedneutral | Not named |
| What AI search monitoring product would help my marketing team find content and off-page actions to improve brand citations in AI answers?Ireland · Feature checklist | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| What should I look for in a monitoring tool if I need brand sentiment, citation tracking, and recommendations I can share internally?Ireland · Feature checklist | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
| How can I measure whether my website is being referenced in assistant responses more often than rival sites?Ireland · Feature checklist | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named | Not named |
Google AI Overview
Checked separately from the four engines, and not part of the score.
- Prompts checked
- 30
- An AI Overview was shown
- 29
- Your site was cited
- 0
- Your brand was named
- 2
Each prompt's result is in the Google AI Overview column of Every answer.
Method
- Not assessed
- No engine was left out of this run.
- Engines and models
The engines on this run, their models and how each answered Engine Model How it answered ChatGPT GPT-5.4 Searched the web Gemini Gemini 2.5 Flash Model knowledge Perplexity Sonar Searched the web Claude Claude Sonnet 4.6 Model knowledge - When
- The run started on 6 September 2026, 17:57 Irish time. Every answer was collected through each provider's API, and the consumer chat apps can answer differently.
- Score
- The score weights the web-search citation rate at 70% and the mention rate at 30%, and is capped at 15 when no answer cited a source alongside you. Engines that fail are left out of every figure, never counted as not naming you, and a score needs usable answers from at least two engines.
- Markets
- Each prompt's target market was sent to every chat engine as the asking user's location; Google AI Overview is additionally geo-targeted to the market.